“Emotional Tagging” is Real When Recruiting New Hires: Here’s Why It’s Dangerous.

Angela Ng

We have come a long way since blatant discrimination when hiring people.

 

Most of the time, it’s not as overt as it was once.

 

Openly choosing not to hire somebody because of their race, or their gender, or their physical characteristics – a lot of that’s just a relic of the past.

 

Or is it?

 

We can’t ignore the numbers.

 

Why is this?

 

Well, a lot of discrimination happens unconsciously.

 

And much of it happens because of what we call emotional tagging.

What is emotional tagging?
A group of people are sitting around a table having a meeting.

'Emotional tagging' is where the brain stores a memory of an event or an action, and also stores an emotion associated with that event or action.

 

Think of it like playing cards. Say you are playing cards and you have to pick a card from two decks (the left and right deck). You feel no emotion because you have no experience between either deck.

But as you keep playing, you begin to experience the pain of picking up a bad card from what you would call a ‘bad deck’ - and your emotions tell you not to pick up a card from that deck again.

 

A lot of it happens when we are kids. We hear our parents saying something negative about a particular category of individuals, and then we grow up associating those individuals with a particular negative emotion. 

 

How does that work with recruiting staff?

A leader who is recruiting a staff member may have had a negative experience with somebody of a particular skin colour, age, gender, historical background, or sexual orientation.

 

This could be work-related or not.

 

This person may then experience an irrational sense of ‘emotional tagging’, where they would tag that person – and other people of a similar characteristic – with that negative emotion.

 

Without them even knowing it, this could adversely affect their hiring practices – leading them to favour those people who aren’t associated with a negative emotional ‘tag’.

 

They may have had a poor experience with somebody when they were kids or may have been completely influenced by their parents’ views.

 

It is all in our subconscious, whether we like it or not.


Why discrimination (unconscious or conscious) can hurt your business and your team
A woman is sitting at a table talking to a man in a suit.

 

Whether or not emotional tagging is affecting leaders in a business, it’s patently clear that the practice of discrimination can have a detrimental effect on a workplace and our teams.

 

More particularly, it can have a colossal negative effect on workplace diversity. 

 

Some of these detriments are as follows.

  • Your workplace will become narrow-minded. Everybody will think in the same way, because your emotional tagging is unconsciously stopping you from hiring the ‘different’. This will stop creativity and innovation, harming the potential growth of the business.
  • Your workplace will suffer a skills shortage. You have no idea what skillsets people from all walks may have, and you’ll miss out on taking advantage of those skills. You may even end up missing a perfect candidate.
  • Your workplace will lack cultural awareness. In a world where international business is vital, and Australia is becoming increasingly multicultural every year, cultural awareness and understanding is essential. This is impossible when everyone in your company is thinking in one way.
  • Your talent pool is reduced. By limiting your own employees – and focusing on only what your emotions want you to do - you are ignoring a massive talent pool. The employees of which may be absolutely stellar for your organisation.
  • It’s illegal. Discrimination in the course of hiring an employee is unlawful under both state and federal laws, so simple – just don’t do it!

 

If you catch yourself emotionally tagging a candidate with an experience you had, and an emotion you felt - stop.

 

It leads us to act irrationally.

 

And it ultimately leads us to make bad decisions.

 

Look at the person for who they are - not what your biases think they are.
 

I hope this article gives you a little more insight into why ‘emotional tagging’ when interviewing new hires is dangerous. Diversity and inclusion are essential parts of the modern workplace.


Other blogs you might like

By Gerard Kerr • October 9, 2026
Executive Career Transition Support Following Organisational Change Organisational change can create uncertainty for employees, particularly for experienced professionals navigating a significant career transition after many years within the same organisation. When a Queensland Government agency needed confidential, one-on-one career transition support for a senior executive employee, they engaged Kingston Human Capital to deliver a personalised program focused on career planning, professional positioning and future employment preparedness. Through a tailored career transition program, Kingston Human Capital provided executive coaching, career planning, professional branding support, resume development, LinkedIn optimisation, interview preparation and practical job-search guidance. The support was designed to adapt to the participant’s evolving needs while remaining aligned with their experience, aspirations and preferred career pathway. The program helped the participant develop a clear career transition strategy, strengthen their professional profile and approach future opportunities with greater confidence. This case study demonstrates how personalised career transition support can assist professionals during periods of organisational change while providing practical guidance for the next stage of their career journey.
A statutory authority: 116 applications and up to 29 hours of panel time nobody had
By Michelle Bassett • September 28, 2026
A project management role on a major infrastructure program closed with 116 applications. Reading them would have taken the panel up to 29 hours before shortlisting began. Kingston Human Capital took the lot and the authority appointed within five weeks.
Nine roles, three months, a deadline that could not move | Kingston case study
By Michelle Bassett • September 28, 2026
A statutory commission needed nine roles filled before a legislated scheme commenced and did not expect it could be done in time. Kingston Human Capital ran nine campaigns as one program. 534 applications, 37 interviews, nine appointments, 11.6 business days shortlist to report.