Why the next manager you hire might need to be a coach? (Not just a manager)

By: Elizabeth Kingston


Do you need a manager or a manager-coach?

..and why the difference matters more than most hiring panels realise.

Most government hiring decisions for managers start with the same goal: We need someone who can deliver great outcomes with integrity. That makes sense. But it’s also where many teams unintentionally cap their future performance.


I’ve worked with multiple government teams who are building capability while under constant delivery pressure. Two teams in particular stood out, not because of their mandate or funding, but because of how they were led.


They started the year in similar places. But twelve months later, the gap between them was clear, and it came down to leadership style.

The two leadership styles that lead to very different outcomes.

The Manager-Manager

This leader:

  • Sets direction
  • Manages tasks and priorities
  • Drives outcomes and deadlines
  • Keeps work moving and visible


Manager-managers are often effective. They deliver. They stabilise. They get things done. In the right context, short-term delivery, compliance-heavy work, crisis response... they can be exactly what a team needs.

The Manager-Coach

A manager-coach does everything from the manager-manager and:

  • Coaches people daily, not occasionally
  • Builds judgement, not just process adherence
  • Lifts confidence and decision-making capability
  • Develops people while delivering outcomes


They don’t choose between delivery or development. They deliberately do both.

A group of people are sitting around a table looking at papers.

Where the real difference shows up

Here’s the part that often gets missed in hiring panels...Both leadership styles can deliver results. But only one of these styles consistently increases the team’s capability over time.

After a year, the differences between teams were clear;

  • One team delivered results, but remained heavily manager-dependent, with a high level of issues and challenges
  • The other delivered results and improved decision quality, confidence, and autonomy, while experiencing a significantly lower level of issues and challenges



The second team’s work became easier, they delivered more and better outcomes. Not because the workload reduced, but because their capability increased.

Think of team capability as an asset

This is the simplest way I’ve found to explain it.

A team’s skill level is an asset. Under some leaders, that asset appreciates. Under others, it slowly depreciates, even if outputs look acceptable.

Most organisations are excellent at measuring:

  • Delivery milestones
  • Outputs
  • Timeframes
  • Activity


But what we rarely measure is this: Is this leader increasing the capability of the people producing those outcomes? Because that difference compounds. Two teams can start the year looking identical. By the end:

  • One is sharper, calmer, and more resilient
  • The other is just busier and more stretched
A group of business people are sitting at a table having a meeting.
A group of people are sitting around a table looking at papers.

Why manager-coaches outperform over time

Manager-coaches create teams that:

  • Make better decisions without escalation
  • Handle ambiguity with confidence
  • Reduce rework and risk
  • Require less hands-on management


The return isn’t just performance. It’s sustainability and a stronger overall team capability. So which one do you actually need? Before you hire your next manager, ask this question:

Do we need someone to manage the work, or someone to grow the people doing the work? Do we need a Manager-Manager or a Manager-Coach?

If the role is:

  • Highly transactional
  • Short-term
  • Narrow in scope


A manager-manager may be enough.


If the role requires:

  • Uplifting capability
  • Reducing dependency
  • Improving judgement
  • Building future leaders


You may need a manager-coach.

How to identify a manager-coach in an interview

Manager-coaches are less common... but they’re easy to spot if you listen properly.



They tend to:

  • Speak naturally about development, not just outputs
  • Explain how they build skill, not just that they do
  • Reference coaching frameworks or ways of thinking
  • Prioritise the skills that move the needle
A group of people are having a meeting in an office.

These are ten of my go-to interview questions for separating manager-managers from manager-coaches:

1️⃣ How they think about capability (not just delivery)

Question

How do you define capability in a team, and how do you know when it’s improving?

Manager-manager answers tend to focus on:

  • Output
  • Timeliness
  • Reduced errors
  • Meeting KPIs


Manager-coach answers tend to include:

  • Judgement and decision quality
  • Confidence and independence
  • Reduced escalation
  • How people think, not just what they produce

2️⃣ How intentional they are about skill-building

Question

When you inherit a team, how do you decide which skills to develop first?

Listen for:

  • Prioritisation, not “everything matters”
  • A clear diagnostic approach
  • Linking skills to risk reduction or outcomes


Red flag

  • “I assess as I go” with no structure

3️⃣ What they do under pressure

Question

Tell us about a time you were under delivery pressure but still invested in developing your team. What did you do?

Manager-manager

  • Development paused due to workload


Manager-coach

  • Development integrated into daily work
  • Coaching through real tasks, not separate sessions

4️⃣ Their coaching muscle (or lack of it)

Question

Can you walk us through a recent coaching conversation you had with a team member?

Strong coach-manager answers include:

  • Clear intent
  • Questions they asked
  • How they guided thinking, not just gave answers
  • What changed afterward


Weak answers

  • General encouragement
  • Performance feedback only
  • No structure or follow-up

5️⃣How they build judgement (critical in government)

Question

How do you help your team develop good judgement in complex or ambiguous situations?

Listen for:

  • Scenario-based coaching
  • Reflection after decisions
  • Teaching how to think, not what to think

6️⃣ Their approach to mistakes and risk



Question

Tell me about a mistake someone in your team made. How did you handle it, and what did the team learn?

Manager-manager

  • Focus on correction and prevention



Manager-coach

  • Focus on learning, judgement, and system improvement
  • Clear distinction between blame and accountability

7️⃣ How they reduce dependency on themselves

Question

What are you doing today so your team needs you less six months from now?

Coach-managers will talk about:

  • Decision frameworks
  • Delegated authority
  • Capability uplift
  • Letting people struggle safely

8️⃣ Their definition of success as a leader



Question

At the end of a year, how do you know you’ve been successful as a manager?

Manager-manager

  • Delivery metrics
  • Stakeholder satisfaction
  • Project completion


Manager-coach

  • Strong delivery metrics and
  • Stronger people
  • Better decisions
  • Increased confidence and autonomy

9️⃣ Their daily leadership habits

Question

What leadership behaviours do you practice daily, not occasionally?

Listen for:

  • Coaching in real time
  • Regular check-ins
  • Observation and feedback
  • Intentional repetition

🔟 The long game

Question

If I spoke to your team in two years, what would they say you helped them become better at?

Coach-managers answer in terms of:

  • Thinking
  • Judgement
  • Confidence
  • Leadership

So next time you’re hiring a manager, ask yourself: "Do I need a manager-manager or a manager-coach?"

One type of manager delivers results. The other delivers results and builds a team that performs better over time — growing capability like an asset that appreciates. In government, where judgement, performance and continuity are critical, that difference is strategic. Before your next hire, be clear: do you need a manager-manager or a manager-coach?


Good luck with your next hire - Elizabeth Kingston, Kingston Human Capital.


If my team or I can help you hire great leaders, contact us at Talent@kingstonhumancapital.com.au

Discover How We’re Different And Give You A Competitive Advantage

Finding needles in haystacks is what we do best. We use traditional and algorithmic-search techniques, video recruitment, and behavioural economics to find you the best talent in the market.

Meet the team

 Access key features, receive alerts, and manage your finances from the palm of your hand, ensuring banking fits seamlessly into your lifestyle.

News and Insights

By Gerard Kerr • October 9, 2026
Executive Career Transition Support Following Organisational Change Organisational change can create uncertainty for employees, particularly for experienced professionals navigating a significant career transition after many years within the same organisation. When a Queensland Government agency needed confidential, one-on-one career transition support for a senior executive employee, they engaged Kingston Human Capital to deliver a personalised program focused on career planning, professional positioning and future employment preparedness. Through a tailored career transition program, Kingston Human Capital provided executive coaching, career planning, professional branding support, resume development, LinkedIn optimisation, interview preparation and practical job-search guidance. The support was designed to adapt to the participant’s evolving needs while remaining aligned with their experience, aspirations and preferred career pathway. The program helped the participant develop a clear career transition strategy, strengthen their professional profile and approach future opportunities with greater confidence. This case study demonstrates how personalised career transition support can assist professionals during periods of organisational change while providing practical guidance for the next stage of their career journey.
A statutory authority: 116 applications and up to 29 hours of panel time nobody had
By Michelle Bassett • September 28, 2026
A project management role on a major infrastructure program closed with 116 applications. Reading them would have taken the panel up to 29 hours before shortlisting began. Kingston Human Capital took the lot and the authority appointed within five weeks.
Nine roles, three months, a deadline that could not move | Kingston case study
By Michelle Bassett • September 28, 2026
A statutory commission needed nine roles filled before a legislated scheme commenced and did not expect it could be done in time. Kingston Human Capital ran nine campaigns as one program. 534 applications, 37 interviews, nine appointments, 11.6 business days shortlist to report.
Kingston Human Capital Recruitment as a Service
By Michelle Bassett • September 28, 2026
A senior finance leadership role, advertised, extended, and still no competitive field. Kingston Human Capital took the campaign over mid-flight and the department appointed without re-advertising. 44 applications, 4 interviews, 2 suitable candidates, 1 appointment.
By Gerard Kerr • September 28, 2026
About Department of Environment and Science (DES) Queensland boasts one of the most diverse and beautiful environments in the world. Without even counting the Great Barrier Reef and its cultural and economic significance to Queensland and Australia, over 64 million visitors flock to Queensland's national parks, forests, and arts and cultural facilities every year. The Department of Environment and Science (DES) exists to protect Queensland's environment so that future generations can enjoy its beauty. Working closely with local government, stakeholders, and communities, the DES works to achieve a better environmental, economic and social future for Queensland. To continue its vital work of protecting Queensland's beautiful, delicate environment, the team at the DES reached out to Kingston as one of their executive recruitment partners. The DES wanted to make sure they partnered with an executive search firm that used both traditional and contemporary recruitment techniques. In addition to traditional executive search, they saw the power of video and understood how contemporary social media talent attraction campaigns would benefit their recruitment project.
By Gerard Kerr • September 28, 2026
About Screen Queensland Screen Queensland is a government-owned company working to make Queensland a global leader for the film and TV industry. As a result of Screen Queensland, the Sunshine State was host to some of the biggest movies of the past decade, including Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales, Kong: Skull Island, and Thor: Ragnarok. In addition to attracting interstate and international productions to Queensland, the company also fosters homegrown talent in Queensland, investing in the diverse, entertaining, and ground-breaking talent in Queensland; creating jobs, stimulating the economy and upskilling our local industry. Screen Queensland has an ambitious plan for the screen and film industry in Queensland, and Kingston Human Capital helped them find an equally ambitious CEO to steer them towards achieving their vision.
By Gerard Kerr • September 28, 2026
About Coexistence Queensland Coexistence Queensland is a unique statutory body dedicated to fostering sustainable relationships between regional communities, landholders, and the energy and resources sector. The organisation plays a critical role in advancing balanced economic, environmental and social outcomes by facilitating dialogue, sharing knowledge and promoting shared value across Queensland. The appointment of a Chief Operating Officer (COO) marked a strategic investment in strengthening organisational leadership. As a newly established executive position, the COO was integral to aligning operations with Coexistence Queensland’s expanded remit and ensuring the organisation’s structure, culture and stakeholder engagement efforts were equipped for a rapidly evolving policy environment. Kingston Human Capital was engaged as a dedicated executive search partner, supporting the Board and CEO to design and deliver a rigorous national recruitment campaign.
By Gerard Kerr • September 28, 2026
About The Economic Development Queensland (EDQ) Established in 2018, Container Exchange (COEX) is a not-for-profit organisation running Queensland’s Containers for Change Scheme, ensuring that over 3 billion drink bottles don't end up as landfill. The Containers for Change Scheme allows people to return eligible drink containers for a 10 cent refund at over 270 sites across Queensland, reducing container litter and encouraging enterprises to raise funds from donations of container refunds. In addition to the Containers for Change Scheme, COEX promotes recycling and helps the local community from donations to charities, community and sports groups, as well as not-for-profit organisations registered with the scheme.
By Gerard Kerr • September 28, 2026
About The Economic Development Queensland (EDQ) Economic Development Queensland (EDQ) is a unique government agency that combines property development with specialist planning functions. EDQ has over 20 locations throughout Queensland providing land solutions to help retain existing industry as well as to attract new business investment and development in Queensland. 
By Gerard Kerr • September 25, 2026
About The Department of Education The Department of Education required an Executive Director and Chief Procurement Officer to provide strategic leadership across procurement and facilities functions within one of Queensland's largest and most complex public sector environments. The role sat within the Finance, Procurement and Facilities Branch and required an executive capable of leading large-scale procurement strategy, influencing stakeholders across a decentralised operating environment and delivering commercial outcomes aligned with government priorities.  Kingston Human Capital was engaged to deliver an end-to-end executive recruitment and selection campaign, including executive search, market mapping, assessment, panel facilitation, reference checking and selection reporting
Show More